Editor's blog Wednesday 10th March 2010: Mid-Staffs legals; and better Telegraph debate
‘Ello. You may remember that I wrote that we should expect legal action over
Mid-Staffs [”http://www.healthpolicyinsight.com/?q=
Editor's blog Monday 8th March 2010: New dodgy data row; Burnham BS "preferred provider"; Telegraph's Mrs Mertonesqe NHS debate
Good day, I hope this finds you well.
You should go first to our latest instalment of The Maynard Doctrine
Editor's blog Wednesday 9th December 2009: What happens next. Warning - may contain plot spoilers.
So, what happens next?
(Yes, I've had another interruption. Sick children thing. You know. Anyway, shut
up, it&
Editor's blog Sunday 7th March 2010: Sunday Times has leaks of US reports on NHS
It would seem that Lord Darzi commissioned three reports from US research
organisations - IHI, Joint Commission International and Rand
Editor's blog Friday 5th March 2010: Here come the cuts (allegedly)
What do you reckon
[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/7379983/Hundreds-of-NHS-wards-to-be-shut-in-secret-plans.html]
, then?
Editor’s blog Thursday 4 March 2010: DH intervenes to prevent CCP ruling over propriety of “NHS preferred provider” policy
It’s a good thing David Nicholson really meant it when he told PCTs to “look out
to your communities,
Editor’s blog Thursday 4 March 2010: SHAs - ten to four, and some thoughts about the NHS untermarket
Ten to four SHAs is the latest rumour, chaps. North, Midlands, South-West and
South-East, is what they are apparently discussing.
Editor's blog Wednesday 24 February 2010: Mid-Stafford report out today - expect fireworks, resignations and legal action
Today will see the publication of the report into the crisis at
Mid-Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust
[http://www.independent.co.
Editor's blog Tuesday 2 March 2010: Sum foolish things
Oh for fuck's sake
[http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/mar/02/nhs-primary-healthcare-trusts-cuts]
.
For.
Fuck's
Editor's blog Monday 1 March 2010: Civitas report on markets in healthcare
I like Civitas: they’re a pretty intellectually honest think-tank. Not all are.
Today, they’ve published The impact of